What’s In a Character: Stan Pines

He’s obviously not what he seems.

Once again, a character piece appears! This time, we’ll be looking at the summer guardian of Dipper and Mabel Pines, con-man extraordinaire and boss of the Mystery Shack, Stan Pines. When watching Gravity Falls, this character in particular stuck out as unique for a number of reasons: He was an older character in a show marketed to a younger audience that received extraordinary character development; evolved beyond the typical two-bit huckster that most other shows might have kept him as, and he was funny as hell. In a show that is really well crafted in every sense of the word, Stan managed to be a big part of that success- the other main character that kept the show rolling along with the Pines twins themselves- and a perfect balancer that proved to be tremendously important. (Oh, and this piece has massive spoilers. If you haven’t taken a trip into the woods yet, I’d suggest either reading my review, or better yet, watching this show. Like now.)

Tying in with my thoughts from the Gravity Falls review, it is almost impossible to guess how interesting Dipper and Mabel’s “Grunkle” Stan would be from the first episode, or how key he would be in the events that unfolded in the show. Aside from the title cards, which notably names Stan along with the twins as main characters, he is quickly shown off as a greedy proprietor of a tourist trap- the Mystery Shack; irresponsible at best with children (his own niece and nephew are put to work as essentially unpaid employees), and a cheapskate to boot- charging exorbitant fees for homemade works of “mystery” such as the “Jackalope” and “Sascrotch,” a fact that is played up all too often between gullible customers and the fact that the town of Gravity Falls, in fact, has real mysteries and phenomena.  Instead, the show goes for the slow drip of information when it comes to Stan, starting with that same first episode (Tourist Trapped), throwing in the intriguing, but mysteriously out of place moment where he quickly punches a code on a inauspicious vending machine, revealing a secret passage…

The irony of Stan’s stage name, “Mr. Mystery,” is that it doubles as a description for who he actually is. Underneath his smiling visage to tourists lay a man with a weighty past, a present that was actually spent selflessly in pursuit of a very specific goal, and most surprisingly, a family man with a heart of gold…unless you mess with them. (Then you’re getting a brass knuckle to the face.) Without trying to summarize too much, here’s the reasons why Stan Pines deserves a character piece to call his own.

He’s old fashioned

Huh? This is a real reason, AniB? Yes, but it’s probably not in the way you think. Stan is his own man. He wear his underclothes around the house without a care in the world, loves his old TV and comfy armchair, and drives a car straight out of the 1960’s like he’s a racecar driver. He also clearly doesn’t care what other people think of him, as long as he gets some attention (and maybe makes a buck.) But really, this section is just a primer.

The real reason… insane character development

The season 2 episode Not What He Seems is universally acclaimed by fans and even critics as one of the show’s best episodes (in a sea of good ones), not the least of which had to do with Stan’s role. (In fact, it has everything to do with him.) As it turns out, he’d been undertaking a dangerous, risky project in the hopes of bringing his brother- Stanford “Ford” Pines, the author of the journals- back home. The Mystery Shack is revealed to be a front in order for Stan to gather the money and the time he needed for equipment to fix the massive underground inter-dimensional portal in the basement of the building; a secret that is revealed initially in Season 1’s finale (Gideon Rises) but comes to a head in this episode, where in the face of a doomsday scenario (a 30 year old portal rending space and time itself), the Pines twins and trusted handyman Soos Ramirez make the discovery. Prior to the last 5 minutes of the episode, Stan had been slowly bonding with the twins over the summer- a prime example of Gravity Falls’ careful development. Starting with a mostly disasterous fishing trip in episode 2 of the show (Legend of the Gobblewonker), he had among other things, gotten over a fear of heights (and ladders) with Mabel (Fight Fighters), helped Dipper prove to Wendy that her then-boyfriend Robbie used a mind-control CD (Boyz Crazy), did his best to protect and help the twins defeat Gideon and save the Mystery Shack (Gideon Rises), participated in a mini-golf outing-turned war (The Golf War) as the getaway car of sorts, and in the episode at hand, shot fireworks off the roof with his niece and nephew mere minutes before government agents apprehended him. While this compilation is not every example, Stan had indeed gone from the absentminded shyster from when the twins first arrived in Gravity Falls, to a loving uncle who they knew as a person…but not in terms of history.

Mabel, do you really think I’m a bad guy?

If you want to really talk about Stan, two words sum it up: Complicated relationships. His past was tumultuous; growing up in the fictional town of Glass Shard Beach, New Jersey, he had a twin brother in Ford, but little else: He wasn’t a genius like his brother, had a reputation as a slacker, and his only ambition seemed to be to sail the world with said brother. After an incident that cost Ford his dream college, Stan (fairly or unfairly) was blamed for everything and thrown out of his childhood home. (While all this can be seen in A Tale of Two Stans, it’s important for context here.) Suddenly, an element you almost never see in a show on a channel generally reserved for a younger audience came into play: An older character with estrangement issues. A rift had grown between he and his brother, and it was physically symbolized by the eventual, short lived reunion that resulted in Ford’s  disappearance into the portal. In that sense, the journals Stan sought to gather, and the portal itself collectively represented Ford- and the deep, deep gap that had developed between the original Pines twins, literally stretching space and time (30 long years). When Ford came back through the portal and gave Stan a square one on the jaw, it was deserved- they had a lot of issues and it was obvious upon thinking about their relationship for this piece and in general, it was absolutely necessary that something dramatic would be the only way to resolve such a gap. It also was a tension that was not lost on the older viewers of Gravity Falls; and that resolution both for the brothers, and Stan’s way of making up for secrets was in the finale: Weirdmageddon.

You’re a real wiseguy, but you made one fatal mistake- Ya messed with my family!

Weirdmageddon is as it sounds- the mad apocalypse of Bill Cipher, the deviously evil mind demon, and while a great deal of events happen here, it is Stan’s role in the final act of this arc (and the show) that proves to be both satisfying and an answer to all the questions created to this point. Up to the point in which Stan volunteers to have his memories erased in order to facilitate the defeat of Bill, Ford and the twins had been playing hero(or attempting to). Since the figurative rift of his relationship with Ford had widened since A Tale of Two Stans,  it was only fitting when the literal rift of space-time was opened in Dipper and Mabel vs. The Future that Stan’s resolution would come. In this case, selfless sacrifice to defeat an indescribable evil was the choice- and it brought out the best of the character in spite of his flaws- his sense of humor, ability to “punch things,” his love for family, and of course, the fact that all Stan ever wanted to do was redeem himself in the eyes of the world- or at least the people he cared about. Some fans gripe about the idea that Stan regained his memories too quickly (or they didn’t want it to happen at all), but reflecting on it, it would have been a poor levity of the balance that Gravity Falls struck as a show between funny and lighthearted; serious and dark. The choice to do so also allowed a complete arc between Stan and Ford- the latter recognized his hubris to an extent and finally appreciated the things his brother had been trying to do, and the former proved to Dipper and Mabel who he was, definitively once and for all, and connected again with Ford. Ultimately, without memory restoration, Stan’s first goal in life wouldn’t have become a reality- a chance to sail the world with Ford on the Stan O’War II. Whether it was punching zombies, making “Stan-cakes,” or seeing the twins off at the end of the show, “Grunkle” and “brother” are really the best descriptors for Stan- a real man with faults and strengths and a fun character all too often absent for his character type in animation.


Like what you see? Comment about it! Oh, and one more thing:

Her aim is getting better! (Get it? If you don’t…well, you will…eventually.)

Author: anibproductions

I am the founder and writer of AniB Productions, currently a fledgling blog with a focus on animated shows from both the East and the West. Love Buffalo sports, good political discussion, and an interesting conversation wherever I go.

5 thoughts on “What’s In a Character: Stan Pines”

  1. I know it’s a bit odd to be commenting on this now, but after think about the show a bit and look at some of your articles I had made an observation that I think might be worth sharing.

    One things that I think is underestimated about Grunkle Stan is how much of his troubles are of his own making and how many problems he causes others. The fact that he couldn’t deal with his brother going off without him (even trying to belittle Ford into staying) caused their broken relationship in the first place. His life of crime made him a pariah in nearly all corners of the country and the world. He pushed his brother through the portal, condemning him to near literal 30 years of hell and further damaging their relationship. And of course he reactivated the portal which nearly destroyed the world initially, and allowed Bill to cause Weridmageddon later on.

    I know that sounds obvious, but it’s something that I think is very easily lost with all the other things that happen in the show, and with how much we are supposed to sympathize with Stan in all of his troubles.

    Now the fact that he does cause all of these problems is not really remarkable in and of itself, pretty much all of the Pines family does that to one degree or another. What’s really, kind of damning about all of this is how he really doesn’t seem to acknowledge or care that he’s at fault. He would much rather play the victim the acknowledge he had a hand in his own, rather terrible fate.

    This makes his petty behavior in Weirdmageddon come across even worse since he was the ultimate cause of it, what with the portal activation and then breaking the zodiac. At the same time though it does lend his sacrifice at the end a new significance.

    After all of that time being bitter at everyone and especially his brother for what’s happened to him, Stanley Pines finally, at the end of the world, took responsibility for his actions and did the thing that no one else could do.

    I think this is significant because unlike you I don’t think Stan was ever looking for redemption or even thought he needed to be redeemed. He was just trying to make things go back to the way they were, never once realizing (or caring) that they couldn’t and it was kind of his fault. That he might have finally realized what had done and tried to make real amends would actually make his sacrifice one of the single biggest pieces of character development in the whole show.

    That being said I don’t think that was actually what the show was trying to imply at the end. The narrative has always favored Stan’s perspective at least a little and I think that holds true even in the finale, but it does allow me to appreciate what he did a little more then I did before.

    I still don’t like the fact he was ultimately the one to take down Bill, nor do I think he fully deserves the heroic accolades he gets, but it’s something.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You’ve got a very detailed insight about Stan, and it’s interesting. He’s always been a kind of screw-up, and a flawed character- which in turn makes him dynamic- but what you suggest is certainly a possibility. I think to Stan the only things in his life that mattered at the critical moment against Bill- the brother he long sought reconciliation with, and the niece and nephew he’d actually become important to- were on the line, and I think beyond the hero connotations, it was better to risk losing all his memories than living out his life full of regrets about the people he cared about most, and that their demise was his fault.

      Like

  2. Well it’s not as though he had much of a choice. If something wasn’t done they were all as good as dead anyway. If you wanted to be a bit more on the cynical side you could say that without his personal connection to the twins he very well have tried to cut a deal with Bill to save his own skin (which would have failed no doubt).

    It is something that is genuinely difficult when analyzing a character that is supposed to be sympathetic. Do you want to give them the benefit of the doubt for their actions, or do their actions justify a more cynical reading of their character? I think both interpretations can be valid, but not necessarily applicable depending on the kind narrative that is being told.

    I guess that brings me to another question that I’d like to ask you. What are your feelings on “authorial intent”?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think the question of sympathies with Stan lies in the fact that we spent the past 39 episodes to that point learning who he was- a flawed man, not without some redeeming traits- and so we’re much more inclined to root for him due to good character writing. (Nobody ever said the hero was always a perfect goody-two shoes.) As for “authorial intent”… interesting question. I think as a writer, you always have a certain idea and intention about where you’d like to send or guide your audience to, but there’s also an acknowledgement that interpretations outside what you even imagined can spring up at any time. In terms of world or character building, of course you want a clear delineation by the climatic resolution of who the “protagonist” and “antagonist” are at that point, but you can certainly leave ambiguity and moral gray areas to give dynamism to development…so long as the story reaches a solid, definitive outcome. From that point, readers make the work take on a new life of its own, for better or worse.

      Like

      1. I guess that’s fair.

        I also agree with the sentiment that the audience is free to reject what the author puts forth, and that the author is under no (strict) obligation to conform his vision to audience desires.

        When analyzing fiction I do think it’s important to consider the author’s intentions, but not to feel limited by them.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s